![]() ![]() A diatonic scale is a 7-note scale containing exactly one note of each letter type, and which contains a mixture of whole and half steps. Both the staff and the keyboard are optimized towards playing diatonic scales. The staff is not optimized for piano, nor vice versa. I propose that this with this version of the staff, we no longer need the sharp accent, and that the Wikipedia quote above would now hold true.Īlso we can see that embedded within the widths of the lines and spaces, is the tone/semitone scale of the clef.Īs mentioned at the top of the post, my questions here are: To make this clear, I present a to scale version of the treble clef, which forms my second assertion: Given that it's possible to have multiple pitches represented in a single staff position (through the use of accidentals), I'd propose that the staff is in some sense, not to scale (pun semi-intended). I don't believe this is true, since a note with a sharp accidental will be higher-pitched that its natural counter part, but it won't appear higher on the staff. ![]() The vertical position of the notehead on the staff indicates which note to play: higher-pitched notes are marked higher on the staff. The Wikipedia page on staff positions states: I have used used (#) to denote the positions in which it is legal to put a sharp.Īt this point I'd like to make my first assersion: Here's the notes of the treble clef, overlaid on a staff where the lines have been expanded to the same width as the spaces: I'm not going to mislead myself with them.After some consideration I have identified why, but I'd like to be sure that: However when moving to string instruments, specifically the guitar and violin (in my case), I find the notation a lot less intuitive. When playing the piano, I find that staff notation with the treble clef makes sense. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |